MCLS 70003, Fall Semester 2007:
Terminology
Studies, Discussion Guide SW5
| SW 5, Alternative Concept Theories |
| Instructor PowerPoint: Alternate
Views on Concept Theory (See MCLS-IAL1/Public/70003) The readings present views of concept theory and the relationship between language and concepts based current findings in psycholinguistics, neuroscience, and philosophy. These views run counter to the so-called "classical view" of concept theory. |
| Readings |
| See
70003_SW5_Incommensurability Folder on
MCLS-IAL1/Public/70003
Server for articles. Deacon, Terrance W. 1997. "Symbols Aren't Simple." In: The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York and London: W.W. Norton Company. Damasio, Antonio R. “Assembling an Explanation.” Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Supplemental: Dohmen, Thomas. 2003. "Kuhn's Incommensurability Thesis." http://www.phil.uu.nl/preprints/ckiscripties/SCRIPTIES/027_dohmen.pdf What challenges do Damasio and Deacon present to the notion of fixed concepts, whereby the external world of "reality" corresponds consistently to the internal world of concepts? Does your experience comparing concepts expressed in multiple languages and cultures support the classical view, or does it come closer to the dynamic views expressed by Deacon and Damasio? Does it matter to you as a linguist what neuroscientists like Damasio and Deacon have to say about language, or what the views of philosophers like Kuhn are claiming? |
| Task Description: |
| No special tasks for this week |
| Student PowerPoint Presentations |
Student PowerPoints: short, 5-10 slide presentations on:
|
| Deliverables |
| Submit PowerPoints after class for inclusion in the MCLS-IAL1 resource. |